McCain Favors Embryonic Stem Cell Research


McCain Favors Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Post to Twitter

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

25 Responses to “McCain Favors Embryonic Stem Cell Research”

  1. lizichell Says:

    Stem cell research using embryos is the most promising area of medical research since we decoded DNA in 1952. It could lead to so many treatments for so many debilitating and chronic illnesses.

  2. PhilippeDeChampaigne Says:

    funklab, I will try to improve my outlook.

  3. funklabADV Says:

    wow philippe, you need some kind of fun in your life. dont be so depressed.

  4. PhilippeDeChampaigne Says:

    funklab, I am sorry. If you hang around me too long you will probably commit suicide. I would have committed suicide a long time ago but I fear the wrath of God. So you might say that God is literally the only thing keeping me alive today. I hate people. Trust me, for your own mental health and general well being, stay as far away from me as possible. I will ruin your perception of reality, if given enough time. Every sky will look gray to you, and everyone will be your foe.

  5. funklabADV Says:

    I would just like to point out that this discussion was about stem cell research, and as a result invitrofertilization, no where did anyone mention anything about mutants. The future is rather bleak, but I believe that there is much good that can be done, and I believe that stem cell research can do some of that good. But we’ve all got to do what we can.
    As Braintax said “I come in peace from a small piece of dark and I’m going back soon, but for now I’ll make marks”

  6. PhilippeDeChampaigne Says:

    Funklab, now that you compel me to analyze it, I feel that everything is pointless. I honestly think that we will blow ourselves up very soon. And if we don’t blow ourselves up, it would only be fitting that the mutants inherit the toxic wasteland. It’s perfect, just like out of a science fiction novel. If the shoe fits, wear it? Ok.

  7. funklabADV Says:

    So in your opinion naturally conceived babies are better than those who were conceived in other ways? I think most people would beg to differ. You should feel free to not procreate and save the planet from overpopulation, but I don’t think anyone has the right to tell other people who can and who cannot have babies. I’d rather be a “artificial” person inheriting a polluted wasteland, than a “real” person inheriting an authoritarian polluted wasteland.

  8. PhilippeDeChampaigne Says:

    Funklab, all I know is, watching the world fall apart for the last 34 years, it’s one step forward and two steps back, a steady downward spiral, ever waiting for the inevitable day when the monkey with the nuclear weapon pushes the fuckin button. All the while, naturally conceived babies being murdered as we create artificial mutant people to inherit a polluted wasteland formerly known as Earth.

  9. funklabADV Says:

    First of all, you are the first person I have met who is willing to stand up against invitrofertilization, and I have a lot of respect for you because of that (most people would not admit it). But it seems rather arbitrary to tell people who cannot reproduce naturally that they cannot have children. Perhaps we should just pick half of all male children and have them castrated at birth, that would help the overpopulation problem. I dont think overpopulation is due to invirto, its too expensive

  10. lj4adotcomdan Says:

    McCain flipped… AGAIN. See my video response.

  11. PhilippeDeChampaigne Says:

    We got abortion clinics, and we got fertility clinics…..MAKE UP YOUR FUCKIN MINDS PEOPLE!!! I’m starting to think that we do indeed need a NEW WORLD ORDER to control stupid people. We need a BIG BROTHER to slap people around because people are so fuckin stupid it makes me sick.

  12. PhilippeDeChampaigne Says:

    I think it’s ridiculous that there is artificial reproduction. It seems that mankind cannot decide whether the planet is overpopulated or underpopulated. You know, there are people (Dr. Pianka for example) that want to cull the masses with aerosolized ebola virus, and then there’s people like you who think we need to make extra, artificial people. LOL! Me, I strike a happy medium. No aerosolized ebola, and no artificial people. COMMON SENSE.

  13. MrJud Says:

    crap, you’re right about the iui. i has bean edumacated.

  14. chapazappa Says:

    In very rare cases after the embryos have been transferred back to the uterus, too many for a woman to carry implant and one chooses selective reduction for the safety of the mother. This is rare because usually clinics do not transfer more than the women can safely carry and it is rare for all transferred to implant. The septuplet phenomena does not happen with IVF. That is another assisted reproductive procedure called IUI.

  15. funklabADV Says:

    Embrionic Stem Cells DO NOT result in the “death” of anyone. Like the man said, stem cells are going to be THROWN AWAY from the invitrofertilization process. So if you are against embrionic stem cell research, you should not fight that battle, you should fight to make invitrofertilization illegal… and in that case you are the one destroying human life (or at least preventing someone from concieving a child).

  16. Freecell82 Says:

    Yeah, I understand that the brain has to be active for the heart to work, but when I say thinking, I mean thinking. Conscious. Not just an active brain. Brain waves were the wrong term for me to use.

    And I am opposed to any abortion that late.

    Yeah, playing devil’s advocate is fun. I just like to argue. It’s why I replied to your post in the first place.

  17. Unklebillybob Says:

    You can argue all you want,,,The bottom line is, in America – at least, we have to contend with the Dickey Amendment.

  18. MrJud Says:

    relaly, i jus tlike playing devil’s advocate. no matter what your position, i’ll poke holes into it. so i’ll stop

  19. MrJud Says:

    some can argue that nervous tissue has to think for you to make your heart beat, breathe, twitch. the autonomics can give “brain waves” or measurable electric activity

    as for sentience, one can argue that post 28 weeks the fetus is unaware of anything, thus still having no rights.

    if you mean as in react to external stimuli, you can damage a 1 hour old embryo and watch it correct itself.

    on my post on conception, it was more to play devil’s advocate of mccain’s altering stances.

  20. Freecell82 Says:

    When did I mention a heartbeat? I didn’t. When I say “functional,” I mean thinking. Conscious. Sentient. Does that happen in 3-4 weeks?

    Also, since when does 3-4 weeks = conception? Conception seemed to be your position in your first post. Is every sperm sacred?

    I don’t argue all that strongly for abortion, and I am against late term abortion, so don’t bother debating that with me. But by pulling this conception BS, you seem to be saying that the unborn are more important than the living.

  21. MrJud Says:

    actually “implanted” isn’t incorrect. yes, you transfer the embryo to the mother-to-be’s womb where it then becomes implanted against the uterine wall. if there’s no implantation, then as you stated there’s no further development. so they transfer multiple embryos and hope at least one implants, but then sometimes you get those septuplet phenomena

  22. MrJud Says:

    according to your comment then they have rights as early as 3 or 4 weeks when functional nervous tissue forms to make a baby’s heart beat.

    go get an education

  23. Freecell82 Says:

    Conception is NOT when humans have rights. They have rights when their brain becomes functional. Who the hell came up with this conception BS?

  24. Freecell82 Says:

    Right. Because of course, the answers will fall into their laps immediately.

  25. Freecell82 Says:

    The fact is, it IS fine. Do those embryos have measurable brainwaves? No? Then they’re not alive. They’re a clump of cells, nothing more. Definitely not human.

    And don’t give me that crap about potential life, either. If you’re not having unprotected sex 24/7, you’re wasting potential life.

    Also, how the FUCK are these embryos more important than people alive? How are they more important than all the people in the future who might contract a disease that could be cured with stem cell research?

Leave a Reply

Comments links could be nofollow free.

Archives
Categories
Born on this day
March 11, 2010
1819 Sir Henry Tate
1885 Sir Malcolm Campbell
1952 Douglas Adams
1923 Louise Brough
1923 Terence Alexander
1932 Lord Nigel Lawson
1947 Alan Yentob
ClickBank Products
Sponsored Links
Search
Follow Us on Twitter: